Semana 1. (31.1.2022)
Introducción al curso. Acuerdos. Asignación de lecturas para reseñas y presentaciones individuales.
Lecturas:
- Navarro, F. y Abramovich, A. (2012) “La Reseña Académica“. En Natale, Lucía. (coordinadora) En carrera: escritura y lectura de textos académicos y profesionales (2012). Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional General Sarmiento.
- Neuman, L. (2006). “Ch 2. What Are the Major Types of Social Research?” Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches.. Boston: Pearson/AandB.
- Walliman, N. (2011). “Ch. 1. Research basics” Research methods: The basics. London: Routledge. pp. 7-14
Laboratorio:
- Alistamiento de cuentas de usuario en Metodos.Work
- Mapeo de conceptos e ideas con GitMind
Semana 2. (7.2.2022)
Combinando métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos.
Investigadora invitada: Riva Quiroga (Universidad Católica de Chile)
Lecturas:
- Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., Baptista Lucio, P. (2010). (5a Edicion). “Capitulo 17. Los métodos mixtos.” Metodología de la Investigación McGraw Hill: México D.F.
- Ruiz Bolivar, C. (2008) El enfoque multimetodo en la investigacion social y educativa: una mirada desde el paradigma de la complejidad. Revista de filosofía y sociopolítica de la educación TERE.
- Thurman, N. (2018). Mixed methods communication research: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in the study of online journalism. SAGE Research Methods Cases.
Lecturas complementarias:
- Snelson, C. L. (2016). Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research: A Review of the Literature International Journal of Qualitative Methods.
- Mertens, D., Bazeley, P., Bowleg, L., Fielding, N., Maxwell, J., Molina-Azorin, J. F., et al. (2016). The future of mixed methods: A five year projection to 2020. Report of the Task Force.
Laboratorio:
- Análisis de tendencias en búsquedas de Internet con Google Trends tool
- Análisis de texto con Google n-Gram viewer
Semana 3. (14.2.2022)
Fundamentos de métodos digitales y computacionales. Estrategias y herramientas para la captura, estructuración y análisis de datos. Dilemas éticos.
Lecturas:
- Cruz Mesa, Hernando (2009). La net-ética desde la perspectiva de una secuencia de investigaciones sociales. Signo y Pensamiento, XXVIII(55),136-151.[fecha de Consulta 16 de Enero de 2020]. ISSN: 0120-4823. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=860/86020246010
- Rogers, R. (2013). “Introduction: Situating Digital Methods” y “The End of the Virtual: Digital Methods.” Digital Methods. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. pp 1-38.
- Wouter van Atteveldt & Tai-Quan Peng (2018) When Communication Meets Computation: Opportunities, Challenges, and Pitfalls in Computational Communication Science, Communication Methods and Measures, 12:2-3, 81-92.
- Venturini, T., Bounegru, L., Gray, J., & Rogers, R. (2018). A reality check(list) for digital methods. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4195–4217.
Lecturas complementarias:
- Trevisan, F. (2014). Search engines: From social science objects to academic inquiry tools. First Monday, 19(11).
- Rogers, R. (2017). Digital methods for cross-platform analysis: Studying co-linked, inter-liked and cross-hashtagged content. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick & Thomas Poell (Eds.). Sage Handbook of Social Media. London: Sage, forthcoming. In Digital Methods reader – summer 2016
- Rogers, R. (2016). Foundations of digital methods: Query design. In M. Schaefer & K. van Es (Eds.).The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. In Digital Methods reader – summer 2016
Laboratorio:
- Visualización y análisis de textos y bases de datos con Databasic.io
Semana 4. (21.2.2022)
Los datos como recurso y su representación: grandes, densos, smart, local, mini … data.
- Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display. Digit. Humanit. Q., 5
- Loukissas, Y. (2018) “Introduction,” y “Chapter 1.” All data are local. Thinking critically in a data-driven society. pp.1-26 Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press
- Walliman, N. (2011). “Ch. 6. The nature of data,” “Ch.7. Collecting and analyzing secondary data”, y “Ch.8. Collecting primary data.” Research methods: The basics. London: Routledge. pp. 65-127
Lecturas complementarias:
- Ardévol, E. (2017). Big data y descripción densa. Virtualis, 7(14), 14-38. Recuperado de
- Manovich, Lev (2017) Cultural Analytics, Social Computing and Digital Humanities. In: Mirko Tobias Schäfer, Karin van Es (Eds.): The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 2017, S. pp 55–68
- Van Schie, Gerwin; Irene Westra, and Mirko Tobias Schäfer (2017) Get Your Hands Dirty. Emerging Data Practices as Challenge for Research Integrity. In: Schäfer, M.T. and Van Es, K. The Datafied Society. Studying Culture through Data. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 2017, pp. 183-200.
- Onuoha, M.(2016-2020) Missing datasets (proyecto). Incluye artículo “The point of collection.”
Laboratorio
- Introducción a Voyant Tools (herramienta para análisis computacional de textos)
Semana 5. (28.2.2022)
Aproximaciones etnográficas: Mundos, trabajo de campo, expediciones y escritura
Lecturas :
- Clifford, James. (1986) “Introduction.” Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkley: University of California.
- Geertz, Clifford. (1973) “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture”, The Interpretation of Cultures : Selected Essays. New York :Basic Books.
- Wolfinger, Nicholas. (2002). On Writing Fieldnotes: Collection Strategies and Background Expectancies. Qualitative Research – QUAL RES. 2. 85-93.
Lecturas complementarias:
- Chan, A. (2014) “Beyond Technological Fundamentalism: Peruvian Hack Labs and “Inter-technological” Education.” Journal of Peer Production. 5. October 2014
- Takhteyev, Y. (2012) “Chapter 1. The Wrong Place.” Coding places. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Watkins, S. C.; Lombana-Bermudez, A., Cho, A; Vickery, J; Shaw, V.; and Weizenber L. (2018) “After the Bell: Why What Kids Do after School Matters” y “Appendix” Design of the Study, The Digital Edge: How Black and Hispanic Youth are Reimagining the Digital Divide. New York: NYU Press.
Laboratorio:
- Taller sobre escritura de notas de campo
Semana 6 (7.3.2022)
Ciberetnografía y etnografía interconectada.
Lecturas:
- Eysenbach, Gunther & Till, James E.. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on Internet communities. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 323. 1103-5.
- Gómez Cruz. E. (2014) Digital ethnography and media practices, The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies: Research Methods in Media Studies, Volume 7
- Rahm-Skågeby, Jörgen. (2011). Online ethnographic methods: Towards a qualitative understanding of virtual community practices. 10.4018/978-1-60960-040-2.ch025.
- Folgueiras, Pilar (2016) Técnica de recogida de información: La entrevista. Documento de trabajo.
Lecturas complementarias:
- Airoldi, M. (2018) Ethnography and the digital fields of social media. International Journal of Social Research Methodology Vol. 21, issue 6, pp. 661-673.
- Coleman. G. (2014) Chapter 1. Hacker, hoaxer, whistleblower, spy: The many faces of Anonymous. London: Verso Books.
- Dilmi, Aluwihare-Samaranayake. (2012). Ethics in Qualitative Research: A View of the Participants’ and Researchers’ World from a Critical Standpoint. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 11. 64-81.
- Shah, Alpa (2017) “Ethnography? Participant Observation, a Potentially Revolutionary Praxis,”in Hau: Journal of ethnographic theory. 7(1):45-59 (2017)
- Taylor y Bogdan (1987, 1994). Capítulo 4: La entrevista a profundidad, Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Ediciones Paidos: Barcelona.
Laboratorio:
- Taller de datos de Twitter: observación, búsqueda, y captura de datasets.
Semana 7 (14.3.2022)
Multimodalidad y análisis de datos cualitativos. Dilemas éticos.
Lecturas:
- Collins, Samuel, Matthew Durington and Harjant Gill (2017). “Multimodality: an Invitation.” American Anthropologist 117(1).
- Dicks, B., Flewitt, R., Lancaster, L., & Pahl, K. (2011). Multimodality and ethnography: working at the intersection. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 227–237.
- González Ávila, M. (2002). Aspectos éticos de la investigación cualitativa. Revista Iberoamericana De Educación, 29, 85-103. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie290952
- Saldana, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.) London, UK: Sage. Chapter 1. Introduction to code and coding.
Lecturas complementarias:
- Alvarez Astacio, P., Dattatreyan, E. G., & Shankar, A. (2021). Multimodal Ambivalence: A Manifesto for Producing in S@!#t Times. American Anthropologist, 123(2), 420–427. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13565
- Fattal, A. (2019) Capítulo dos: Operación Navidad. En Guerrilla Marketing: contrainsurgencia y capitalismo en Colombia. Guerrilla Marketing: contrainsurgencia y capitalismo en Colombia. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad del Rosario.
- Lombana-Bermudez, A. and Watkins, S.C. (2020) “Building a music innovation ecosystem: Creative labor in hip hop culture.” In Young People’s Transitions Into Creative Work: Navigating Challenges and Opportunities. New York: Routledge.
- Revisar Mini documentales que hacen parte de esta investigación: Canal de DoingInnovation en YouTube.
- Hurdley, R., & Dicks, B. (2011). In-between practice: working in the ‘thirdspace’ of sensory and multimodal methodology. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 277–292.
Laboratorio:
(21.3.2022 : festivo)
Semana 8 (28.3.2022)
Estudios de caso: Contexto, empiricidad, y narrativa.
Lecturas:
- Baxter, P. and Jack, S. (2008) Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13, 544-559.
- Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
- Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Chapter 1: Introduction, Chapter 2: Designing Case Studies. Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
Lecturas complementarias:
- Creswell, J. W (2007). Chapter 4: Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches.
- Rowley, J. (2002), “Using case studies in research”, Management Research News, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170210782990
- Creswell, J. W & Asmussen, K. (1995). Campus Response to a Student Gunman. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 575-591. Copyright 1995, the Ohio State University Press.
Laboratorio:
Taller sobre estrategias para estructurar un estudio de caso
Semana 9 (4.4.2022)
Tipos de estudios de caso: diseños y narrativas.
Entrega propuesta de proyecto final (v1) : Guía para elaboración de proyecto final (propuesta y trabajo final)
Lecturas:
- Guetterman, T. C., & Fetters, M. D. (2018). Two Methodological Approaches to the Integration of Mixed Methods and Case Study Designs: A Systematic Review. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 900–918.
- Kim, P., & Hutt, E. (2021). K-pop as a Social Movement: Case Study of BTS and Their Fandom ARMY. Journal of Student Research, 10(3).
- Megehee, C.M., & Woodside, A.G. (2010). Creating visual narrative art for decoding stories that consumers and brands tell. Psychology & Marketing, 27, 603-622.
- Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl 2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Lecturas complementarias:
- Akella, M. (2011). Learning with Stories: A Personal Case Study Approach in Communication. InSight : A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 6, 60-70.
- Asenjo, A. & Coddou, A. (2021) Economía de plataformas y transformaciones en el mundo del trabajo: el caso de los repartidores en Santiago de Chile. Organización Internacional del Trabajo. Cono Sur – Informes Técnicos / 17 – 2021
- Brandell, J. & Varkas, T. (2001). Narrative case studies. In The handbook of social work research methods (pp. 294-307). SAGE Publications, Inc.,
- Barreneche, C., Lombana Bermudez, A., & Ramos Martin, J. (2021). Datificacion en contextos de corrupcion: imaginarios sociotecnicos y practicas de resistencia frente a sistemas antipobreza en Colombia. Palabra Clave, 24(3), e2434.
- de Godoi T.X., da Silva Junior D.P., Costa Valentim N.M. (2020) A Case Study About Usability, User Experience and Accessibility Problems of Deaf Users with Assistive Technologies. In: Antona M., Stephanidis C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Practice. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12189. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49108-6_6
- Sun, M. (2020). K-pop fan labor and an alternative creative industry: A case study of GOT7 Chinese fans. Global Media and China, 5(4), 389–406.
Laboratorio:
- (Taller sobre estrategias narrativas)
- Taller sobre DMI-TCAT
Semana Santa : Abril 10 – 16
Semana 10 (18.4.2022)
Redes y Datos. Conceptos básicos de redes sociales. Herramientas y estrategias para mapear y visualizar redes sociales como grafos.
Lecturas:
- Hanneman, Robert A. and Mark Riddle. (2005). Chapter 1: Social network data, Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside ( published in digital form at https://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/) (Traducción en Español disponible en http://revista-redes.rediris.es/webredes/textos/Introduc.pdf)
- McPherson, Miller et al. (2001), “Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks.” Annual Review of Sociology, 2001, 27, pp. 415–44.
- Ortega Guerrero, J.C. (2016) Las redes sociales y su modelado matemático, Ensayos Pedagógicos, ISSN-e 2215-3330, ISSN 1659-0104, Nº. Extra 1, 2016, págs. 19-35
Lecturas complementarias:
- Venturini, T., Bounegru, L., Jacomy, M., & Gray, J. (2017). “How to Tell Stories with Networks: Exploring the Narrative Affordances of Graphs with the Iliad.” In The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data, edited by Mirko Schaefer and Karin Van Es. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
- Boutyline, Andrei y Robb Willer (2017), “The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks”, International Society of Political Psychology, Volume38, Issue3, June 2017, pp. 551-569.
- Ramos-Vidal, I. (2016). Popularidad y relaciones entre iguales en el aula: un estudio prospectivo. Psicología Educativa, 22(2), 113–124. doi:10.1016/j.pse.2015.12.001
Laboratorio:
- Introducción a Graphcommons
- Taller sobre mapeo de redes
Semana 11(25.4.2022)
Redes sociales digitales: minería de datos, visualización y análisis.
Entrega propuesta de proyecto final (v2)
Lecturas:
- Hanneman, Robert A. and Mark Riddle. (2005). Chapter 3: Using graphs to represent social relations y Chapter 10: Centrality and power, Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside ( published in digital form at https://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/)
- Kuz, Antonieta et al. (2016), “Análisis de redes sociales: un caso práctico”, Computación y Sistemas, 20(1), pp. 89-106.
- Himelboim, Itai et al. (2017), “Classifying Twitter Topic-Networks Using Social Network Analysis”, Social Media + Society, January-March 2017, pp. 1-13.
Lecturas complementarias:
- Verhoeven, Deb; Moore, Paul S.; Coles, Amanda; Coate, Bronwyn; Zemaityte, Vejune; Musial, Katarzyna; Prommer, Elizabeth; Mantsio, Michelle; Taylor, Sarah; Eltham, Ben; Loist, Skadi; Davidson, Alwyn: Disciplinary itineraries and digital methods: Examining the Kinomatics collaboration networks. In: NECSUS_European Journal of Media Studies. #Method, Jg. 9 (2020), Nr. 2, S. 273–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/15320.
- Grandjean, M. (2016). A social network analysis of Twitter: Mapping the digital humanities community. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 3(1), 1171458.
- Humberstone, James (2019), “Análisis de redes sociales: Identificación de comunidades virtuales en Twitter”, Realidad y Reflexión, vol. 50, n.º 50, pp. 70-81.
Laboratorio:
- Introducción a Gephi
Semana 12 (2.5.2022)
Difusión de la información en redes sociales.
Lecturas:
- Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength Of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360-80.
- Guille, Adrien & Hacid, Hakim & Favre, Cécile & Zighed, Djamel. (2013). Information Diffusion in Online Social Networks: A Survey. ACM SIGMOD Record. 42. 17-28. 10.1145/2503792.2503797.
- Törnberg, Petter (2018), “Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion”, PLoS ONE Journal 13(9), pp.1-21.
Lecturas complementarias:
- Bessi, Alessandro et al. (2015) “Viral misinformation: The role of homophily and polarization”, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, pp. 355–356.
- Halberstam, Yosh y Brian Knight (2016), “Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter,” Journal of Public Economics, Volume 143,2016, pp. 73-88.
- Barbera, Pablo (2018) “Explaining the Spread of Misinformation on Social Media: Evidence from the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.” Comparative Politics Newsletter. The Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association. Volume 28, Issue 2, Fall 2018. pp.7-11.
- Vosoughi, S., D. Roy, and S. Aral (2018) “The Spread of True and False News Online,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1146–1151, Mar. 2018.
Laboratorio:
- Análisis y visualizaciones de red con Gephi
- Explorando redes de noticias con Media Cloud
Semana 14 (16.5.2022)
Entrega (email) y publicación (entrada/post en website del curso) del proyecto final